Legal Opinion

Rong Rong Jiang v. Tan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered March 26, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing all but one cause of action and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As to the breach of contract claim, the contract and bill of sale for the restaurant specifically called for a sales price of $150,000 that could not be changed orally. The parol evidence rule bars admission of any prior or contemporaneous oral agreement that may vary or add to the terms of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comtomark, Inc. v. Satellite Communications Network, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. SAA-A, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Perfume & Cosmetics Palace, Inc. v. CGU InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 West 40th Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Kalt v. RitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Deutsch Tane Waterman & Wurtzel, P.C. v. HochbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
  4. Brembo, S.P.A. v. T.A.W. Performance LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. FX Funding LLC v. Fox RX Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API