State ex rel. Gregory v. Masheter

The motion is well taken. The order overruling the motion to quash service of summons is not a final appealable order as defined by Section 2505.02, Eevised Code. Eespondent is not precluded by the overruling of the motion to ouash but may make a full defense in the action without waiving his objection to jurisdiction. State, ex. rel. Rhodes, Aud., v. Solether, Judge, 162 Ohio St. 559.

The issue as to . venue has been answered in the case of *44State, ex rel. Barber, Pros. Atty., v. Rhodes, Aud., 165 Ohio St. 414. The ease should be brought in Franidin County against the respondent.

Appeal…