Legal Opinion

Pepera v. Weidely Co.

City of Cleveland Municipal Court

Decided July 1, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ARTL, J.

Action in tort for damages sustained by the plaintiff as the result of the alleged violation of a duty owed to plaintiff by defendant corporation. The following is a statement of the facts as found by the court, the case having been tried without the intervention of a jury.

On or about June 8, 1936, the plaintiff, a young man of the age of 25 years, purchased from the defendant, a corporation, a certain used 1929 Pontiac automobile, for a price, a part of which was financed through a finance company. Because said purchase price was to be financed, the bill oi sale, after…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCoy v. BaerOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API