Legal Opinion

Putnam v. City of Salina

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1933No. 30,732; No. 30,733PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

These actions, consolidated for purposes of trial, were brought by plaintiffs to enjoin the city of Salina and its officials from constructing a new channel for the Smoky Hill river at and near the eastern limits of the city. The project was designed to protect public and private property thereabout from recurring floods. The proposed channel was to be 3,500' feet in length, and would shorten the tortuous course of the stream to the extent of several miles. The improvement also contemplated the construction of a dam, certain dykes, and a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Board of Commissioners v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Lasnier v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Barker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Keach v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Cow Creek Valley Flood Prevention Ass'n v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API