State v. Chapman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The defendant has appealed following his conviction for the crime of robbery (17 M.R.S.A. § 3401). We deny the appeal.
Pursuant to Rule 33, M.R.Crim.P., the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which delineated the reasons underlying this appeal, namely:
“1. The Court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for a brief continuance;
2. The Court erred in denying" substantial parts of Defendant’s motion for discovery;
3. The Court erred in charging the jury and in refusing to charge the jury as requested by Defendant;
4. The verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence;
5.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- John C. Rastrom v. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. RollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- State v. St. OngeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. BoucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.