Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 26, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

The defendant has appealed following his conviction for the crime of robbery (17 M.R.S.A. § 3401). We deny the appeal.

Pursuant to Rule 33, M.R.Crim.P., the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which delineated the reasons underlying this appeal, namely:

“1. The Court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for a brief continuance;

2. The Court erred in denying" substantial parts of Defendant’s motion for discovery;

3. The Court erred in charging the jury and in refusing to charge the jury as requested by Defendant;

4. The verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence;

5.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. John C. Rastrom v. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  3. State v. McDonoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. State v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. State v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. RollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. State v. St. OngeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. State v. BoucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API