Legal Opinion

Berline v. Waldschmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1945No. 36,303PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action in which plaintiff sought to extend the terms of a mineral deed, which would otherwise expire, for such period as war-time regulations make it unlawful to drills test well on real estate covered by the terms of the instrument under which he acquired his interest.

The petition alleges that on May 27, 1939, the defendants, who were then the owners of the real estate therein described, executed and delivered a mineral deed conveying an undivided one-half interest in and to all of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under, *586an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marrs v. City of OxfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. T.S.I. Holdings, Inc. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. West Los Angeles Institute for Cancer Research v. Ward MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Sunflower Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Tomlinson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API