Legal Opinion

Responsive Innovations, LLC v. Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 28, 2012No. 4:08CV1184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 72) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 73 corrected 76). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, in part, and grants in part, and denies, in part, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Procedural Background

This is a patent infringement case brought by Responsive Innovations, LLC (“Responsive”) and Turning Technologies, LLC (“Turning”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S&N Locating Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API