Legal Opinion
Charles Kastner v. Michael Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 10, 2012No. 11-1166PublishedCited by 375 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Suffering from a degenerative disc disorder and pain in various parts of his body, Charles R. Kastner sought disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 423(d). He asserts that his disorder of the spine constitutes a disability under the Social Security Act. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined that, though Kastner’s impairments are severe, they do not meet listed requirements for a presumptively disabling condition and that Kastner has residual capability to perform certain jobs in the economy. After the Appeals Council denied review, Kastner sought…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Parker v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by375 opinions
- Jimmy Radford v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Daniel Minnick v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Meuser v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Plessinger v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Michael Zellweger v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
370 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.