Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jennings v. City of Homestead

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 1992No. 92-273Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

The first two cases cited in support of the majority’s per curiam affirmance hold that failure to allege compliance with the prelitigation notice requirements of section 768.57, Florida Statutes,1 does not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction and that the trial court may consider principles of estoppel and waiver to excuse such noncompliance. That rule of law answers the narrow procedural issue presented by the order of dismissal from which this appeal is taken, and compels a reversal.

It is alleged that Claudia Jennings, a bedridden patient at James Archer Smith Hospital, suffered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Ingersoll v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Hospital Corp. of America v. LindbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Barnett Bank v. Estate of ReadSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Solimando v. International Med. CentersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API