Stewart v. American Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
We reversed the decrees entered in favor of appellee in the causes above entitled for the reasons stated in our opinion in 80 F.(2d) 600. Thereupon appellee applied for rehearings. Other insurance companies asked to intervene in that application as friends of the court, and permission was granted. Through their counsel they, as well as counsel for appellee, have filed briefs, and claimed errors in our reversal have been elaborately argued. The whole controversy is whether appellee had a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law and was thereby precluded from proceeding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Di Giovanni v. Camden Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Cable v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Viles v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Stewart v. American Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Herron v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018