Bell v. Kater
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 Andrea Kater, the defendant below (Kater), appeals from the trial court’s November 1, 2002 order denying her post trial motions and entering judgment in favor of Edward Bell and Deborah Bell, husband and wife and the plaintiffs below (the Bells). The Bells appeal from the trial court’s January 15, 2003 order that granted Kater’s petition to file her appeal from the November 1, 2002 order and judgment nunc pro tunc. We conclude that Kater’s appeal must be quashed as untimely. We further conclude that the Bells’ appeal must be dismissed as moot.
¶ 2 A description of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BishopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- WEIMAN BY TRAHEY v. PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PolandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bell v. KaterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Stanton v. Lackawanna Energy, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SalleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- John v. Phila. Pizza Team, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.