Fredericksen v. Singer Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $500 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
In disposing of this case, we decline to notice appellant’s assignments of error numbered 1, 2, 4, and 5, because each is clearly insufficient, under the rules laid down in Wilson v. Minn. Farmers', etc., Ins. Ass’n, 36 Minn. 112, (30 N. W. Kep. 401,) and Dun*357can v. Kohler, 3,7 Minn. 379, (34 N. W. Rep. 594.) The first, which is stated as “error in admitting incompetent, immaterial, and irrelevant evidence against objection,” is a fair example of the others, and falls far short of indicating to the court, or to the opposing counsel, the specific error relied upon; that is, what testimony…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holbrook v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Wilson v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Duncan v. KohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Daniels v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Keith v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- In re GranstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Lobdell v. KeeneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901