City of Fayetteville v. S & H, INC.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I fully concur in that part of the majority opinion
which upholds that portion of the ordinance prohibiting flashing or blinking signs; but I am compelled to express my disagreement with the remainder of the majority’s holding and opinion.
In order that my position be made as clear as possible, I feel it is appropriate that some additional background be set out.
Appellees brought thjs proceeding against the City of Fayetteville seeking a declaratory judgment that Fayetteville City Ordinance 1893, as amended, is void on its face and as applied to them. The ordinance is a comprehensive sign…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.