Legal Opinion
M&z Trading Corp. v. Hecny Group
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2002No. 01-55121; D.C. No. CV-98-02395-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Appellant M&Z Trading Corp. (“M&Z”) appeals a judgment in favor of defendants Cargolift Ltd., Hecny Group and Hecny Transportation Inc. (collectively “Cargolift”) on M&Z’s claim that Cargolift was liable for the loss of M&Z’s cargo. Cargolift entered into a contract with M&Z to ship M&Z’s cargo, consisting of two containers of ginseng ethyl alcohol composition. The Latvian authorities seized the cargo as contraband, while it was en route to Russia.
The district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c) that Cargolift successfully established…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lekas & Drivas, Inc. v. GoulandrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Evanow v. M/V NeptuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Mateo v. M/S KisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sedco, Inc. v. S.S. StratheweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sicom S.P.A. v. TRS Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Zhu v. LiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019