Legal Opinion
Gandy v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 31, 2006No. CIV-03-1224-PCT-JATPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion in Limine (“Motion”) regarding loss of future earnings. (Doc. # 145). On May 10, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendant’s Motion. The Court now rules on this motion.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 27, 2003, Sally Robbins (“Decedent”) filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Ms. Robbins brought the Complaint under the Federal Torts Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 et seq., alleging medical negligence on the part of the Defendant, United States of America. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. GreeneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Gotbaum Ex Rel. Gotbaum v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Girouard v. Skyline Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Manion v. Ameri-Can Freight Sys. Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Andrich v. KostasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.