Legal Opinion

In re Pacific Electric & Automobile Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 8, 1915No. 5374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Pacific Electric & Automobile Company, a corporation, bankrupt. On petition to review order of referee, denying a reclamation petition of the Burrows Adding Machine Company.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

On December 9, 1914, the Pacific Electric & Automobile Company was adjudged bankrupt. On April 30th, prior to adjudication, the bankrupt had purchased from the Burrows Adding Machine Company, an adding machine, upon a conditional sale contract, which contract was not signed by the vendor, and not filed for record as provided by Remington & Ballinger’s Code of Washington, § 3670, within 10 days after its execution. On April 30, 1915, petition and demand for reclamation of the machine was made by the Burrows Adding Machine Company, and the matter was heard before the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Live Stock State Bank v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. In re FrankelDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API