Legal Opinion

Tabbs v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 1979No. 1174 and 1197, September Term, 1978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The broad umbrella known as the law of double jeopardy envelops four distinct sub-doctrines: 1) classic former jeopardy, arising out of the common law pleas in bar of autrefois convict and autrefois acquit; 2) simultaneous jeopardy, involving largely issues of merger and multiple punishment; 3) retrial following mistrial and 4) collateral estoppel. It is the third of these — retrial after mistrial — that concerns us here.

This particular sub-doctrine of law was never considered a part of common law double jeopardy in Maryland, Hoffman v. State, 20 Md. 425, 433-434 (1863); Kyle v. State, 6 Md.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MasonheimerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API