Tabbs v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
The broad umbrella known as the law of double jeopardy envelops four distinct sub-doctrines: 1) classic former jeopardy, arising out of the common law pleas in bar of autrefois convict and autrefois acquit; 2) simultaneous jeopardy, involving largely issues of merger and multiple punishment; 3) retrial following mistrial and 4) collateral estoppel. It is the third of these — retrial after mistrial — that concerns us here.
This particular sub-doctrine of law was never considered a part of common law double jeopardy in Maryland, Hoffman v. State, 20 Md. 425, 433-434 (1863); Kyle v. State, 6 Md.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex Parte MasonheimerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.