Legal Opinion

United States v. Homero Alaniz-Alaniz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1994No. 94-60114PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

Today we review the district court’s revocation of a period of supervised release and imposition of a mandatory jail term. The court based its decision on a finding that the appellant violated a standard condition of supervised release by conspiring to possess marihuana. Because we hold that the district court was correct in its assessment of the evidence, including its admissibility, we AFFIRM.

/.

On August 1, 1988, Homero Alaniz-Alaniz (Alaniz) pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute approximately 390 grams of cocaine. The district court sentenced Alaniz…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Woody Hyatt McCormick Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. William J. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Frank GrandlundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Noemi Duarte FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API