Legal Opinion

Barron v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided October 21, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LATASHA MECHELLE BARRON, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-00322-KD-N ) MOBILE COUNTY DEPARTMENT ) OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al., ) Defendants. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This civil action is before the Court on the amended motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs, or in forma pauperis (“IFP”), under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(Doc. 5), filed by the Plaintiff, Latasha Mechelle Barron (“the Plaintiff”), who is proceeding without counsel (pro se). The amended IFP motion was timely…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V MonadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API