Legal Opinion
United States v. Cockerham
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2001No. 98-7189Published
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2001)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TOMMY DON COCKERHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 98-7189
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
January 18, 2001
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. (D.C. No. 98-CV-158-B & 95-CR-49-B) Howard A. Pincus, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tommy Don Cockerham filed a pro se brief.
Jeffrey A. Gallant, Assistant United States Attorney (Bruce Green, United States…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.