Legal Opinion
Pine v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 23, 1996No. 14-94-00809-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
Livestock owned by Robert Edward Pine, appellant, were seized by law enforcement officers because of his alleged cruel treatment of the animals. Criminal and civil actions were brought against Pine that resulted in his conviction for cruelty to animals and the forfeiture of his affected livestock. 1 Fol lowing a hearing in justice court, the forfeiture case was tried de novo in county court where a jury found that Pine had treated his animals cruelly. The judgment divested Pine of ownership of the animals and ordered they be given to a nonprofit animal shelter. See Tex.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Texas, the State Of v. Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($30,660.00) in U.S. Currency, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Neely v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Granger v. Folk, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- Four Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Two Dollars in United States Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- 1995 CORVETTE VIN 1G1YY22P585103433 v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.