United States v. Javier Aparco-Centeno
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
This action stems from a criminal defendant’s appeal of a district court’s determination of his sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, re-entry of a deported alien. Defendant-Appellant Javier Apar-co-Centeno argues that his sentence of seventy-seven months is inaccurate because his prior convictions should not have qualified as aggravated felonies under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) (1994) and § 2L1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1994) (“U.S.S.G.”), and that the prior conviction used to enhance his sentence was required to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Donald PriddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Michael SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Alan Hoover v. Timothy WalshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Edres MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.