Legal Opinion

United States v. Javier Aparco-Centeno

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2002No. 00-1889PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

This action stems from a criminal defendant’s appeal of a district court’s determination of his sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, re-entry of a deported alien. Defendant-Appellant Javier Apar-co-Centeno argues that his sentence of seventy-seven months is inaccurate because his prior convictions should not have qualified as aggravated felonies under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) (1994) and § 2L1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1994) (“U.S.S.G.”), and that the prior conviction used to enhance his sentence was required to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald PriddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Michael SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Alan Hoover v. Timothy WalshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Edres MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API