Legal Opinion

Breeden v. . McLaurin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Issues joined in a Special Poceeding, tried before Ciarle, Judge, at February Term, 1887, of Richmond Superior Court. In tliis action, begun before the Clerk for partition of the tract of land described in this petition, the petitioners alleged that they were tenants in. common with the defendant, each being entitled to one-fifth part thereof. ■ Tim defendant denied the alleged tenancy, and asserted a sole seizin in himself.

Read the full summary

Issues joined in a Special Poceeding, tried before Ciarle, Judge, at February Term, 1887, of Richmond Superior Court. In tliis action, begun before the Clerk for partition of the tract of land described in this petition, the petitioners alleged that they were tenants in. common with the defendant, each being entitled to one-fifth part thereof. ■ Tim defendant denied the alleged tenancy, and asserted a sole seizin in himself. The issue thus formed was transferred to the Superior Court for trial and was passed on by the jury, who found the tenancy to exist, and from the judgment thereon the…

1Opinion of the Court

Smíth, O. J.,

(after stating the case). We do not see the force of the objection to the reception of what passed between the parties. It amounted to no more than an arrangement that if the petitioners established their claims to four-fifths of the land, and the defendant would sue upon .his covenant, and let them have what he might recover, that would be accepted in payment of their shares, and defendant should have an absolute estate in severalty in the lands. Nor do we see any harm to the defendant that could ensue from admission of the evidence

The remaining exception is to the refusal of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. . BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crews v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Ellington v. . EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API