Legal Opinion

Brose v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Bonita Brose (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which raises once again the issue of a claimant’s entitlement to counsel fees, under Section 440 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 for an unreasonable contest in litigating by further appeal the award of such fees.

On December 1, 1991, Claimant sustained a work-related injury, in the nature of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, while working as a computer operator for Keystone Optical Laboratory (Employer). Claimant subsequently received compensation benefits pursuant to a Notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Allums v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. C. Meade v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API