Brose v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Bonita Brose (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which raises once again the issue of a claimant’s entitlement to counsel fees, under Section 440 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 for an unreasonable contest in litigating by further appeal the award of such fees.
On December 1, 1991, Claimant sustained a work-related injury, in the nature of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, while working as a computer operator for Keystone Optical Laboratory (Employer). Claimant subsequently received compensation benefits pursuant to a Notice of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Allums v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arnold v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- C. Meade v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016