Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court Cases

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 21, 2006No. 2:06-mj-00015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JENKINS, Senior District Judge.

The above-captioned proceeding is now before the court on Curtis Richmond’s motion to amend his pleadings following this court’s dismissal of his original petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).

Procedural History

Plaintiff Curtis Richmond commenced the above-captioned action by filing a document captioned as a “Writ of Mandamus Confirming Pembina Nation Little Shell Calif. Federal Tribal Circuit Court Ordered Writ of Mandamus so Law Enforcement Must Obey Lawful Tribal Court Orders Supported by U.S. Supreme Court…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Talbot v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API