Legal Opinion

State v. Massey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 25, 1981No. 21606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was indicted on a charge of grand larceny. Before his trial began, he requested that his court-appointed counsel be relieved and that he be allowed to represent himself. The presiding judge asked the appellant about his age, education, employment, and prior observation of court proceedings. The judge advised appellant of his right to counsel and instructed the appointed counsel to remain at the defense table to answer any questions. Appellant’s request to represent himself was granted, and he proceeded without receiving any assistance from counsel. Appellant was convicted of grand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CashSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BatemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API