Legal Opinion
Lupardo v. I.N.M. Industries Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
On this motion defendants move for various forms of relief pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 9(b), 12(b) (1) and 12(b) (6). Affidavits have been submitted by the moving parties in connection with this motion, but they have been disregarded by the court, since the motion will be decided solely under the rules set forth above.
The complaint, on its face, alleges a violation of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This is sufficient to sustain jurisdiction as alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction of the second count can be sustained either on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Reitmeister v. ReitmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Investors Funding Corp., Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Herzfeld v. Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Schenck v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Pawgan v. SilversteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.