Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Ohren
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 1, 1999No. 98-3683PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
739 So.2d 684 (1999)
Ricky TUCKER and Michael Okun, Appellants,
v.
Nathan OHREN, et al., Appellees.
No. 98-3683.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 1, 1999.
G. Ware Cornell, Jr. and Arianne Bombalier Suarez of G. Ware Cornell, Jr., P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Thomas D. Daiello of Thomas D. Daiello, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee Nathan Ohren.
STONE, J.
Tucker appeals the denial of her rule 1.540(b) motion for relief from judgment, and Tucker and Okun appeal a final judgment awarding attorney's fees in favor of the defendant, Ohren. We affirm the order denying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Stockman v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- United Pacific Ins. Co. v. BerryhillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Dealers Ins. v. Haidco Inv. EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Harrison v. La Placida Community Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sanchez v. State Farm Florida Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Bright v. BaltzellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Black v. BEDFORD AT LAKE CATHERINE ASS'N, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Florida Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'n v. City of GreenacresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Goldfisher v. Ivax Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.