Legal Opinion
Traub v. Arrow Manufacturing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kapper, J.:
The defendants, on July 29,1921, separately demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it “ does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” At the time each such demurrer was interposed, it was an allowable pleading; it had not then been “ abolished.” (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 487, 488, 490; Civ. Prac. Act, § 277.) The Special Term overruled the demurrers, granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, with leave to defendants to answer over, and also denied defendants’ motion to vacate said order. Defendants appeal from both orders, and they are here in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Godley v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Schenectady Contracting Co. v. Schenectady Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Paul G. v. Donna G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bloom v. GelbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Schoenberg v. SchoenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Irish Free State v. Guaranty Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.