Legal Opinion

Danielly v. Colbert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Debtor and Creditor. Bona fides. Notice. Judgment. Titles. Statute of Limitations. Jurors. Waiver. Before Judge Simmons. Crawford Superior Court. March Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hutchins, Judge.

This was a claim case, in which the claimant relied on the proposition that he had bona fide, and for a valuable consideration, purchased the land levied on, and had been in the possession of it for four years, and that it was discharged from the lien of the judgment, under the provisions of section 3583 of the Code.

The facts presented by the record are, in substance, as follows:

On November 9, 1868, Colbert, as administrator oí Harris, obtained a judgment against O. C. Whittington, principal, and James N. Mathews, security, upon which execution was issued September 27, 1871.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Prater v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Broughton v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeVaughn v. McLeroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Hale v. Robertson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Moate v. RivesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Reynolds v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Carter & Ford v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API