Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

EXCEPTIONS FROM ClROuiT C0URT, ElRST C1RCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

For past history of this ease, see 13 Haw. 245, Tb. 716, and 14 Haw. 669. The case is now here on defendant’s exceptions taken at the third trial.

At the close of the evidence the defendant moved that the jury be directed to render a verdict in its, the defendant’s, favor, upon the ground, among others, “that upon the undisputed and uncontradicted facts shown by all the evidence in said cause, the defendant’s defense of the statute of limitations was and is fully sustained, both in fact and in law,” and after verdict moved, on the same ground, for judgment ?ian…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deponte v. Ulupalakua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re the Determination & Declaration of the Heirs of KeamoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Smith v. LaameaHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Territory ex rel. Bailey v. GayHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lai v. KukahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API