Legal Opinion
Hiles v. Progressive Relocation Systems Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 20, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01984Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 WO 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 10 11 Jay Hiles, et al., No. CV-20-01984-PHX-DJH 12 Plaintiffs, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. 14 Progressive Relocation Systems Incorporated, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 TO THE HONORABLE DIANE J. HUMETEWA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 19 COURT JUDGE: 20 This is a Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act cause of action 21 brought by Plaintiffs Jay and Trish Hiles against Defendant Progressive Relocation 22 Systems Incorporated, dba Moving Services (Doc. 1). The District Judge referred this 23 matter to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.