Legal Opinion

Piscataqua Nav. Co. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 22, 1898No. 903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This libel is for damages for the detention of several vessels, through the obstruction of Ft. Point Channel, in Boston Harbor,: by the fall of a draw in a railroad bridge. The defendant’s duty in respect to the draw is prescribed by a Massachusetts statute of 1845 (chapter 126): “And the corporation shall be held liable to keep said draw in good repair, and to open the same when required, so as to afford all reasonable and proper accommodation for vessels having occasion to pass through the same.” Upon the evidence I find that the fall of the draw, and the consequent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Blackwell v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Shaw v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re the Libel of China Union Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
  3. Kirwin v. Mexican Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1920
  4. Barbar Lines A/S v. M/V Donau MaruDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
  5. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API