Legal Opinion

Roscoe v. City of Everett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1925No. 19276. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

— Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for herself and for the benefit of her minor child on account of the death of her husband, alleged to have been caused by drinking polluted water furnished by the city of Everett. From a judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, tliQ defendant has appealed. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

This case involves many of the same facts as are detailed in Aronson v. Everett, post, p. 312, 239 Pac. 1011, whereby polluted water was permitted to pass into the city mainp through a by-pass connection at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aronson v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Castner v. Tacoma Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horton v. Town of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Boguski, Admr. v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  3. Safransky v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Lincoln Trust Co., Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Skoug v. MintonWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API