Legal Opinion
Linnett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 30, 1983No. 63864PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
CLINTON, Judge.
Withdrawn is the opinion on original submission by which the Court reversed the judgment of the conviction after finding that a search of an automobile being driven by appellant was not within the scope permitted by Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969). At the instance of the State Prosecuting Attorney, we granted leave to file State’s Motion for Rehearing in order to consider the application in Texas of the “workable rule” announced by the Supreme Court July 1,1981 in New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Azeez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- State v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.