Belveal v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentTimbers, Senior Circuit Judge
I believe the majority’s myopic reading of § 2(d)(5) works an injustice on the plaintiff class before us and makes a mockery of the equitable powers of our Court. In my view § 2(d)(5) is amenable to the equitable relation-back doctrine. I believe the district court’s erroneous denial of class certification presents a classic case for applying the relation-back doctrine. From the majority’s failure to invoke our Court's equitable powers, I respectfully dissent.
The relation-back doctrine and its application to the erroneous denial of class certification is well established by the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Joe N. BYRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Ricardo De Leon v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Manuel A. Miranda v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.