Legal Opinion · Dissent

Belveal v. Heckler

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1986No. 84-2647Published

1DissentTimbers, Senior Circuit Judge

I believe the majority’s myopic reading of § 2(d)(5) works an injustice on the plaintiff class before us and makes a mockery of the equitable powers of our Court. In my view § 2(d)(5) is amenable to the equitable relation-back doctrine. I believe the district court’s erroneous denial of class certification presents a classic case for applying the relation-back doctrine. From the majority’s failure to invoke our Court's equitable powers, I respectfully dissent.

The relation-back doctrine and its application to the erroneous denial of class certification is well established by the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Joe N. BYRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Ricardo De Leon v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Manuel A. Miranda v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API