Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Hames

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 22, 1977No. 76-2241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Petitioner Chrysler Corporation by common law certiorari seeks review of an Order of the trial court entered after Petitioner was dropped as a Defendant by the Respondents who were Plaintiffs at trial. Briefly, Plaintiffs came to trial without complying with a pre-trial Order. When it became apparent to them they might not be able to present certain witnesses and documentary evidence, they announced' on the record a “voluntary dismissal” of Chrysler Corporation as a Defendant. We presume it was Plaintiffs’ intention to “drop” Chrysler Corporation as a party Defendant under…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Ins. Co. v. FatolitisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. Jupiter Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Kuhn v. HarlessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Department of Legal Affairs v. HeimDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API