Chrysler Corp. v. Hames
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
Petitioner Chrysler Corporation by common law certiorari seeks review of an Order of the trial court entered after Petitioner was dropped as a Defendant by the Respondents who were Plaintiffs at trial. Briefly, Plaintiffs came to trial without complying with a pre-trial Order. When it became apparent to them they might not be able to present certain witnesses and documentary evidence, they announced' on the record a “voluntary dismissal” of Chrysler Corporation as a Defendant. We presume it was Plaintiffs’ intention to “drop” Chrysler Corporation as a party Defendant under…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Ins. Co. v. FatolitisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- National Bank of Commerce v. Jupiter Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Kuhn v. HarlessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Department of Legal Affairs v. HeimDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997