Montana Power Company v. .Carey
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
The HONORABLE THOMAS A. OLSON, District Judge,
sitting for MR. JUSTICE SHEEHY, concurring and dissenting:
I agree with the majority that the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) has statutory authority to impose conditions or limitations on a new water permit to ensure that senior appropriators are not left short of water. In this case, I would approve of DNRC’s condition that Monforton not irrigate if the senior users needed *100water. The practical effect of such a limitation would vary from year to year, depending upon the availability of water for irrigation. As I shall point…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Tucker v. Missoula Light & Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Norman v. CorbleyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Mettler v. Ames Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.