Legal Opinion

City of Delaware v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1954No. 33660Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

At the outset it may be observed that appellants expressly- disclaimed any purpose of contending that the petitions and applications for rehearing should be treated as complaints pursuant to Section 524, General Code, that the railroad’s service to Delaware is not adequate. Cf. New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 157 Ohio St., 257, 105 N. E. (2d), 410.

It is the position of appellants that the railroad’s letter of August 28, 1952, was an application for abandonment of service and that appellants were entitled to a hearing thereon as provided in Section 504-3, General Code.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Delphos v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cincinnati Northern Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Village of Millersburg v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API