Legal Opinion

Gleaton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1937No. 26320Published

1Opinion of the CourtG-tjerry, J.

1. In a prosecution under tie Code, §§ 54-110 (4), 54-9901, it is not sufficient for the State to show merely that .the defendant procured labor within the State for the use of himself beyond the boundaries of the State, but it should also be shown that he did so without notifying “the commissioner of his intention to secure labor *876within the State for use outside the State, stating how many laborers are to be secured, where the labor is to be secured, where said labor is to be transported, the pay to be given said labor, why the labor can not be secured in the State where it is to be used,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kitchens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Conyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  3. Rumph v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Theus v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API