Legal Opinion

Hotel Armstrong, Inc. v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William C. Hecht, Jr., J.

Plaintiff instituted suit seeking a declaratory judgment that, inter alia, section 2 (subd. 2, par. [b]) of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1959, ch. 695) is inapplicable to make plaintiff’s premises subject to rent control and that section 4 (subd. 2, par. [b]) is unconstitutional.

The gist of plaintiff’s grievance is that its hotel never having been previously controlled and having at all times been a hotel free of rent control, it could not now be controlled.

The pertinent statutes provide as follows:

“ § 2. Definitions. '* * *
“ 2. ‘…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pitts v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Pitts v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Figari v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Hotel Armstrong, Inc. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API