Hotel Armstrong, Inc. v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
William C. Hecht, Jr., J.
Plaintiff instituted suit seeking a declaratory judgment that, inter alia, section 2 (subd. 2, par. [b]) of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1959, ch. 695) is inapplicable to make plaintiff’s premises subject to rent control and that section 4 (subd. 2, par. [b]) is unconstitutional.
The gist of plaintiff’s grievance is that its hotel never having been previously controlled and having at all times been a hotel free of rent control, it could not now be controlled.
The pertinent statutes provide as follows:
“ § 2. Definitions. '* * *
“ 2. ‘…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pitts v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Pitts v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Figari v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Hotel Armstrong, Inc. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960