Legal Opinion

State v. Serna

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 20, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-0546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

Appellant Joe Alonzo Serna (“Defendant”) was charged with possession of narcotic drugs, a class 4 felony. Pursuant to Defendant’s agreement to waive a jury trial, he submitted his case to the trial court based upon a stipulated record. The trial court found Defendant guilty, suspended sentence, placed him on probation for four years, and sentenced him to six months’ deferred incarceration as a condition of probation.

The drugs were found as a result of a warrantless search of Defendant (a stu dent) by public high school security guards. This appeal requires us to define…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. JarzabArizona Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re L.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. In Re LASupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API