Legal Opinion

Harris v. Prudential Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1935No. 7699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

William Sullivan Harris filed an application on July 21, 1934, under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 USCA § 203), alleging that “he is personally bona fide engaged in farming operations and that the principal part of his income is derived from farming operations. * * * ” He alleges that either personally or through the medium of tenant farmers he operates some 1,602 acres of farm land in Imperial county, Cal.; that he is solvent and desires to affect a composition or extension of time to pay his debts which, according to schedule A, aggregate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkerson v. CoochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of California, Department of Employment v. Fred S. Renauld & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. In re McGrewCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CucciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Blevins v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. In re JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API