Legal Opinion

Bond v. Hutchins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

In 1923, in two several actions, defendant Dare sued these plaintiffs for moneys earned in selling stock for them. Counterclaims were interposed in both actions, to the effect that Dare had been guilty of conduct amounting to fraud on these plaintiffs in his operations as their representative. Dare was entirely successful in each case; the judgment against the Granite Company was affirmed by this court (Dare v. Granite Bond & Mtge. Corp., 223 App. Div. 809) and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was denied by the Appellate Division (224 App. Div. 699) and the Court of Appeals. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Luce v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Brooklyn Distilling Co. v. Standard Distilling & Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Luce v. New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Walsh & Mallory v. OstranderNew York Supreme Court · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurley v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. People v. KirkupNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. 64 West Park Avenue Corp. v. Parlong Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Duesler v. State BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API