Legal Opinion

Mott Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Blue Ridge Coal Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 16, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonoghue, J.

A decision as prescribed in a Supreme Court action tried without a jury is, fortunately, not required of us who labor in the Municipal Court (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 125). The number and type of actions neither permit nor require that rationalizations be written. Yet occasionally cases are presented to us of such complexity or significance that some statement should be made, to show what findings and conclusions were made and how they were reached. Of that description is this action whereby plaintiff, lessor, seeks to hold defendant, lessee, as a holdover tenant.

The demised premises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Haynes v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Congregation Anshe Sefard of Keap Street, Inc. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Canfield v. Elmer E. Harris & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Canfield v. Elmer E. Harris & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Music IncorporatedAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Comedy v. VitoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API