Legal Opinion

Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Schellenger

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 22, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill for direction in performance of trust.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

A careful consideration of the matter here presented leads me to the conclusion that the income in question, which was payable and should have been paid to Thaddeus W. Markley in his lifetime, passed at his decease to his personal representatives as a part of his estate.

The well-established rule of the common law was to the effect that a trust could not be created with a provision that the inter*139est of the life cestui que trust could not be alienated or subjected to the claim of his creditors. The only manner in which that result could be accomplished to the exclusion of rights…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L'Hommedieu v. L'HommedieuNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. The Trust Co. of N.J. v. GardnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Moore v. MooreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  4. Chelsea-Wheeler Coal Co. v. MarvinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API