Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 2005No. 1031699PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

906 So.2d 892 (2005)

Ex parte FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF ALABAMA, INC., d/b/a Family Dollar, and Regina Nichols.

(In re Toni Natasha Holloway; and Jeshaylin Ware and Takory Ware, minors, by and through their mother and next friend, Toni Natasha Holloway

v.

Family Dollar and Regina Nichols).

1031699.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 7, 2005.

William C. McGowin of Bradley Arant Rose & White, LLP, Montgomery, for petitioners.

Peter A. Dumbuya, Phenix City, for respondents.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, Inc., d/b/a Family Dollar ("Family Dollar"), and Regina Nichols petitioned this Court…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Evans v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Classroomdirect. Com, LLC v. DRAPHIX, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Hilyer v. FortierSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Carroll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Ex Parte Suzuki Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. D.B. v. D.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API