Legal Opinion

Barrenscheen v. Grosch

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 26, 1940No. Gen. No. 41,192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Plaintiff filed a bill to construe the will of Henry Barrenscheen. The case was heard by the court upon the complaint, with the will of Henry Barrenscheen attached, and the joint and several answer of defendants. The complaint prayed that the court find: “A. . . . that plaintiff was by the will aforesaid vested with a fee simple title to all the real estate aforesaid free and clear of all charges of any and every kind and nature whatsoever,” and that the court find “B. . . . that plaintiff, under the last will and testament of the said Henry Barrenscheen aforesaid, became seized and possessed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fifer v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Boyd v. StrahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Parsons v. MillarIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Giles v. AnslowIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gahan v. GoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cickyj v. SkeltinskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Francis Fasline v. City of Campbell, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  3. Hartman v. MeierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API