Legal Opinion

Czumaj v. Borzelleri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court should have granted plaintiffs’ motion to the extent that it sought partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. "While negligence cases do not generally lend themselves to resolution by motion for summary judgment, such a motion will be granted where, as here, the facts clearly point to the negligence of one party without any fault or culpable conduct by the other party” (Morowitz v Naughton, 150 AD2d 536, 537; see also, Dawkins v Craig, 216 AD2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morowitz v. NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Hamilton v. PurserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Ruotolo v. Ambu-Wagon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Dawkins v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Flores v. PharmakitisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DePetres v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Bush v. BlankenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API