Legal Opinion

John Deere Construction & Forestry Company v. Carl S. Parham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 2014No. A13A1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIRD DIVISION ANDREWS, P. J., DILLARD and MCMILLIAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ March 5, 2014 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A1948. JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY v. PARHAM. MCMILLIAN, Judge. John Deere Construction & Forestry Company (“Deere”) instituted a deficiency action against Carl S. Parham to recover the balance owed on a direct loan following the repossession and sale of a piece of farm equipment. After…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Benefield v. TominichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Rigdon v. Walker Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Tucker v. Chung Studio of Karate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Holder v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Brown v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API